HomeNews & updatesTreaty Bodies: More progress towards harmonised cycles of review - International Service...

Treaty Bodies: More progress towards harmonised cycles of review – International Service for Human Rights

ktsimage / Envato elements
ISHR welcomes the adoption of predictable cycles of reviews by all Treaty Bodies with full reviews every eight years, followed by focused reviews after four. It remains to be seen if and how implementation will work out in practice though.
On the occasion of their most recent meeting, the UN Treaty Bodies (UNTB) chairpersons went a step further in the adoption of a harmonised schedule of fixed reviews of States parties. As previously mentioned, this constitutes an important outcome of the 2020 review. ISHR welcomes the fact that all UNTBs with a regular periodic review cycle have now adopted a similar cycle, and that the differentiation between the Covenant Committees, and the other Committees has been abandoned. 
A new vision for the UN #humanrights Treaty Bodies system: 10 Chairpersons agree on a predictable #review schedule for all States parties. Learn more here 👉https://t.co/BkvsoWz9dd pic.twitter.com/OvTIpEeP5G
— UN Treaty Bodies (@UNTreatyBodies) June 24, 2022
The adoption of fixed cycles of review was initially adopted by the Human Rights Committee in 2018, but since then implementation has been marred by a range of practical challenges, and reviews have mostly not been able to proceed as per the schedule. The Covid pandemic has profoundly and durably affected periodic reviews: sessions were canceled and reviews of States parties postponed, resulting in a backlog of 443 State reports pending review as of December 2021. Quite clearly, reconciling the chaos in the scheduling of reviews induced by the pandemic with a fixed schedule of reviews now constitutes a major challenge. 
On paper, the idea of a fixed schedule of full reviews every eight years, with an additional check-in at mid-course sounds attractive, as demonstrated for instance by the fixed cycle and mid-term check-in at the Universal Periodic Review (UPR). And yet, a significant number of States have recently been able to escape scrutiny by differing reviews or failing to show up, as illustrated by reviews such as Nicaragua at CEDAW, CESCR and CAT, or Russia at the Human Rights Committee. Without robust and lasting solutions to these practical challenges, the implementation of predictable cycles of reviews across UNTBs could remain wishful thinking. 
Vincent Ploton
Vincent leads ISHR’s strategic engagement and litigation with the UN Treaty Bodies. He is also a member of the Advisory Boards of the Oxford Journal of Human Rights Practice, and the Land Rights Now campaign. Vincent holds an Msc in political science (SOAS, University of London) and an MBA (EICD 3A, Lyon).
Vincent Ploton
[email protected]
Twitter @vploton
During a Human Rights Council debate with High Commissioner Volker Türk on the human rights impact of recent municipal elections in Nicaragua, the International Service for Human Rights (ISHR) and 33 organisations, including from the Colectivo 46/2 coalition, launched a global call for the two-years renewal of the Council’s resolution on Nicaragua.
On 9 December 2022, the Human Rights Council’s Organisational Meeting took place. UNOG announced that hybrid modalities during HRC sessions will be provided for the first quarter of 2023. The presidential statement decided that more discussions were required to reinstate general debates in the June session. The latter is considered an encouraging outcome, as it does not completely exclude the return of these important debates in the June session.
Faced with allegations of authoritarian influence in Parliament’s work, the institution needs to be ‘louder and stronger’ on human rights globally – not reward those same governments with their silence.
Would you like to be informed of future events, news, updates on our work, invitations and appeals? Please enter your email address below!
Copyright © 2022 International Service for Human Rights
Charity web design and branding by Fat Beehive


- Advertisment -

Most Popular

- Advertisment -